K-numberK242569
Device nameMixed Reality Spine Navigation
ApplicantBrainlab AG
Product codeSBF
Device classClass II
Decision dateMay 16, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation882.4560
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

Mixed Reality Spine Navigation is software that runs on Magic Leap 2 MedTech glasses and works with Brainlab's Spine & Trauma Navigation system. It displays 2D navigation screens and a 3D virtual model of patient anatomy with stereotactic information about tracked surgical instruments during pedicle screw placement procedures. The virtual display is meant to supplement, not replace, the stereotactic information shown on the main navigation platform.

Technological characteristics

The subject device uses the Magic Leap 2 MedTech mixed reality headset (an optical see-through head-mounted display) instead of a traditional monitor display. It employs encrypted Wi-Fi data transfer from the Image Guided Surgery platform to the headset, gesture controls for user interaction (versus the predicate's touch screen), and Mixed Reality Toolkit GUI technology (versus HTML5). Navigation accuracy remains identical at ≤2 mm positional error and ≤2° angular error, and it uses the same optical tracking localization as the predicate.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1 Edition 3.2 (basic safety), IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.1 (EMC), ISO 10993-1:2018 (biocompatibility), IEC 63145-20-10:2019, IEC 63145-20-20:2019, and IEC 63145-22-10:2020 (eyewear display optical properties). Software testing followed FDA guidance on Device Software Functions at Enhanced Documentation level.

Substantial equivalence argument

The device performs the same fundamental function as the predicate—displaying navigation information to support surgeon guidance during spine surgery with identical navigation accuracy specifications. While it adds a new display modality (mixed reality headset) and different user interface technology, the clinical purpose, intended use environment (operating room), localization technique, and performance characteristics are equivalent. The predicate comparison demonstrates that differences in hardware (Magic Leap 2 MedTech versus prior display) and interface method (gesture control versus touch) do not alter the essential therapeutic function or safety profile.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →