K-numberK242224
Device nameHappy Health Home Sleep Test
ApplicantHappy Health, Inc.
Product codeMNR
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 18, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation868.2375
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Happy Health Home Sleep Test is a software-as-a-medical-device that processes data from wearable devices (specifically a smart ring with PPG and accelerometer sensors) to record and analyze biophysical parameters for evaluating sleep-related breathing disorders in adults aged 22 and older. It computes an Apnea Hypopnea Index (hAHI) and total sleep time to aid clinicians in diagnosing sleep apnea in clinical and home settings.

Technological characteristics

The subject device is a SaMD product designed to work with compatible external hardware devices, whereas the predicate (NightOwl) is a wearable device combining hardware and software. Both use PPG and accelerometer signals to compute AHI and total sleep time via proprietary algorithms based on peripheral arterial tone (PAT) detection, though the subject device uses a PAT-derived hAHI while the predicate uses pAHI. Both comply with IEC 62304 software standards.

Test standards cited

IEC 62304 (medical device software development), FDA Guidance for Software Contained in Medical Devices, FDA Guidance on Cybersecurity in Medical Devices, FDA Guidance for Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering, and American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) guidelines for manual polysomnography scoring.

Substantial equivalence argument

Both the subject and predicate devices are Class II breathing frequency monitors with identical product codes and regulations. Clinical validation demonstrates the subject device's hAHI correlates strongly with manually scored PSG-AHI (regression slope 0.98, R=0.98, Bland-Altman limits -9.8 to 10.7 events/hr), which meets the same performance criteria as the predicate (regression slope 0.9981). The TST performance (mean absolute difference 24.9 minutes) is comparable to the reference device (30.8 minutes). The architectural difference—SaMD versus integrated hardware-software—does not raise new safety or effectiveness questions since the compatible hardware uses identical sensor technology and the algorithms produce equivalent clinical outputs.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →