K-numberK241862
Device nameLevina Pelvic Floor Muscle Stimulator (RS-48)
ApplicantZmi Electronics , Ltd.
Product codeKPI
Device classClass II
Decision dateMar 27, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation876.5320
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Levina Pelvic Floor Muscle Stimulator (RS-48) is a non-implantable home-use device that delivers electrical stimulation via an intravaginal probe to strengthen pelvic floor muscles. It is intended to treat stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence in women and to maintain urinary continence through neuromuscular reeducation and Kegel-like muscle contractions.

Technological characteristics

The subject device uses biphasic, symmetrical rectangular waveforms with pulse widths of 200–300 microseconds and frequencies of 12–50 Hz. Compared to the predicate Yarlap II, the subject device has narrower frequency range (12–50 Hz vs. 2–100 Hz), lower maximum output voltage at 10 kΩ (50 V vs. 95 V), and lower maximum output current across impedance levels. The electrode area and current density profiles are similar, with the subject device measuring 6 cm² versus the predicate's 6.4 cm².

Test standards cited

Testing was performed per ISO 10993-1:2018 (biocompatibility), IEC 60601-1:2020 (electrical safety), IEC 60601-1-2:2020 (electromagnetic compatibility), IEC 60601-1-11 (home healthcare environment requirements), IEC 60601-2-10 (nerve and muscle stimulator requirements), FDA guidance on software verification and validation, and FDA cybersecurity guidance (September 27, 2023).

Substantial equivalence argument

Both devices share identical indications for use, target population, environment of use, prescription/OTC status, electrode type (incontinence probe), and waveform characteristics (biphasic, symmetrical). Although the subject device has lower maximum output parameters at certain impedance levels and a narrower frequency range, the submission demonstrates through reference devices and performance testing that these differences do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness. The subject device's parameters are supported by predicate and reference device data, and all electrical performance and biocompatibility testing met acceptance criteria.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →