K-numberK241806
Device nameApplied Biosystems™ TaqPath™ COVID-19, Flu A, Flu B, RSV Select Panel
ApplicantLife Technologies Corporation
Product codeQOF
Device classClass II
Decision dateJan 8, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation866.3981
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Applied Biosystems TaqPath COVID-19, Flu A, Flu B, RSV Select Panel is a multiplex real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) test that qualitatively detects and differentiates SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B viruses, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from nasopharyngeal and anterior nasal swab specimens. The test is intended to aid in the differential diagnosis of these respiratory infections in patients exhibiting signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infection.

Technological characteristics

The device uses real-time RT-PCR technology with gene-specific primers and probes targeting three SARS-CoV-2 genes (Orf1a, Orf1b, N), two influenza A genes (PB1, M), two influenza B genes (M, NS), and three RSV genes (NP, M, L protein), plus RNase P as an internal control. It differs from the predicate BioFire RP2.1 in specimen types (includes anterior nasal swabs), instrumentation (QuantStudio 5 Dx instead of FilmArray systems), and sample prep methodology (external magnetic bead-based kit versus integrated pouch system).

Test standards cited

Not stated in this summary. The document references CLSI EP24-A2 for Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis but does not cite formal consensus standards such as ISO, IEC, or ASTM.

Substantial equivalence argument

Substantial equivalence is based on identical intended use (detection and differentiation of the same four respiratory viral targets), same analyte type (RNA), same technological principle (real-time RT-PCR), same specimen type foundation (nasopharyngeal swabs, with anterior nasal as additional type), and automated test interpretation. Clinical performance data from 1,909 prospective and enriched subjects demonstrated high positive and negative percent agreement with the predicate comparator across both specimen types, with PPA ≥93.8% and NPA ≥99.36% for all targets, supporting that the device performs substantially similarly to the predicate despite differences in instrumentation and workflow components.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →