K-numberK241652
Device nameDASH® SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test
ApplicantNuclein, LLC
Product codeQOF
Device classClass II
Decision dateDec 20, 2024
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation866.3981
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The DASH SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test is a rapid RT-PCR assay performed on the DASH Rapid PCR Instrument for simultaneous in vitro qualitative detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B virus RNA in anterior nasal swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infection. The test aids in differential diagnosis in conjunction with clinical, epidemiologic, and laboratory findings.

Technological characteristics

Both the subject device and predicate use RT-PCR amplification for nucleic acid detection with magnetic bead purification technology and qualitative reporting. The key difference is that DASH uses a single reaction chamber with a four-channel LED fluorometer, whereas the predicate (BioFire SPOTFIRE) uses an array/spot format. Both devices include automated test processes, internal controls, and separately sold external controls, with approximately 15-minute result times.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1-2 Ed. 4.1:2020 (electromagnetic disturbances), IEC 61010-1 3rd edition (safety), IEC 61010-2-010:2019 (heating of materials), IEC 61010-2-101:2018 (in vitro diagnostic equipment), CLSI EP12 3rd Edition (qualitative test performance), CLSI MM03-3rd Edition (molecular diagnostic methods), CLSI EP07 3rd Edition (interference testing), CLSI EP25 2nd Edition (reagent stability).

Substantial equivalence argument

Both devices are classified under the same regulation (21 CFR 866.3981) and product code (QOF) with the same intended use population and clinical application. The subject device demonstrates comparable analytical performance through sensitivity/specificity testing with 95.2%-97.3% positive percent agreement and 98.1%-99.5% negative percent agreement against FDA-cleared comparator tests. Analytical validation including inclusivity, cross-reactivity, and interference testing shows the single-chamber design performs equivalently to the predicate's array format. Clinical performance across seven sites with 795 evaluable subjects confirms the device functions as intended without raising new safety or effectiveness concerns.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →