K-numberK241593
Device nameBoneMetrics (US)
ApplicantGleamer Sas
Product codeQIH
Device classClass II
Decision dateFeb 5, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation892.2050
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

BoneMetrics (US) is a fully automated radiological image processing software that uses machine learning to measure Cobb angles on frontal spine radiographs in patients aged 4 years and older with suspected or present spinal deformities such as scoliosis. The software receives DICOM images automatically, processes them without user input, and returns annotated result images with angle measurements overlaid, intended as a concurrent reading aid for radiologists.

Technological characteristics

BoneMetrics uses convolutional neural networks for image classification and vertebral landmark detection, followed by classical methods to compute Cobb angles. Unlike the predicate device (IB Lab LAMA), it does not perform segmentation, compute auxiliary points, or calculate distances—only angle measurements. The processing architecture is simplified to spine-specific measurements rather than the multi-limb capabilities of the predicate.

Test standards cited

Not stated in this summary.

Substantial equivalence argument

Both devices are fully-automated radiological image processing software using convolutional neural networks and classical computational methods to generate automated anatomical measurements on radiographs for use by trained radiologists. Although BoneMetrics targets spine/Cobb angles (versus the predicate's limb-length and knee alignment measurements) and younger patients (4+ years versus 22+ years), these differences do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions because the fundamental technology and intended use—providing accurate, reproducible automated measurements as a reading aid—remain identical. The same mitigation controls apply: dedicated algorithm training for the specific indication and population, plus clinical performance testing demonstrating Mean Absolute Errors of 2.56°–2.78° across all patient groups, meeting the pre-specified acceptance criteria.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →