K-numberK241454
Device nameMinvitro® Vitrification Straw (MVT-VSN series, including MVT-VSNR, MVT-VSNY, MVT-VSNB, MVT-VSNG, MVT-VSNP)
ApplicantGuangzhou Hehong Biotech Co., Ltd.
Product codeMQK
Device classClass II
Decision dateFeb 3, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation884.6160
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Minvitro® Vitrification Straw is a single-use, sterile cryopreservation device designed to store human oocytes (MII), 4-8 cell embryos, and blastocyst stage embryos during vitrification procedures. It consists of a handle, carrier sheet with fine tip, and a cap with balancing head, and is available in five color variants (red, yellow, blue, green, purple).

Technological characteristics

Key differences from the predicate include: subject device uses ethylene oxide sterilization versus predicate's gamma radiation; subject materials include PETG carrier sheet and ABS handle versus predicate's polypropylene/stainless steel; subject warming rate is 40,000°C/min versus predicate's 44,000°C/min; dimensions differ slightly (total length 131 mm versus 116 mm). Both use closed vitrification systems with identical -3,000°C/min cooling rates and SAL 10⁻⁶ sterilization assurance levels.

Test standards cited

ISO 11135:2014 (ethylene oxide sterilization), ISO 11607-1-2006/Amd 1-2014 and ISO 11607-2-2006/Amd 1-2014 (sterilization packaging), ISO 11737-1:2018 and ISO 11737-2:2009 (sterility testing), ISO 11138-2:2017 (biological indicators), ISO 10993-7:2008 (ethylene oxide residues), ASTM D4169-22 and ASTM D4332-22 (transportation and conditioning), ASTM F1980-21 (stability testing), USP <85> (endotoxin LAL method), ASTM F1886/F88/F1929 (package integrity), and 2021 FDA guidance on Mouse Embryo Assay.

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject and predicate devices serve identical intended uses (vitrification storage of human oocytes, 4-8 cell embryos, and blastocysts) under the same regulation (21 CFR 884.6160) and product code. Although technological differences exist in sterilization method, materials, dimensions, and warming rate, these differences do not raise new safety or effectiveness concerns. The subject device's non-clinical performance testing—including sterilization validation, endotoxin testing, cooling/warming rate verification, and mouse embryo assays meeting ≥80% blastocyst development criteria—demonstrates equivalent safety and effectiveness to the legally marketed predicate device.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →