K-numberK241451
Device nameRusch Endotracheal Tubes (Reinforced); Rusch Endotracheal Tubes (Safety Clear); Rusch Endotracheal Tubes (Safety Clear Pediatric)
ApplicantTeleflex Incorporated
Product codeBTR
Device classClass II
Decision dateFeb 11, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation868.5730
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Rusch Endotracheal Tubes are sterile, single-use devices inserted into the trachea via the nose or mouth to establish a patent airway for ventilation. Three variants are cleared: Reinforced (with embedded stainless-steel spiral for kinking resistance), Safety Clear (with radiopaque line), and Safety Clear Pediatric. All are available in cuffed and uncuffed versions, with or without Murphy Eye, for pediatric and adult patients.

Technological characteristics

The subject devices are made of PVC without DEHP (unlike predicates containing DEHP), feature 15mm connectors, are sterilized via ethylene oxide at 10-6 SAL, and contain compatible cuffs, inflation lines, pilot balloons, and one-way valves. The Reinforced tube has an embedded stainless-steel spiral; Safety Clear tubes incorporate a radiopaque line for visualization. Size ranges are within or narrower than predicate ranges (Reinforced 3.5–10.0 mm vs. predicate 2.5–11.0 mm).

Test standards cited

ISO 10993-1 Fifth Edition 2018-08 for biocompatibility testing, including cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, acute systemic toxicity, material-mediated pyrogenicity, implantation, subacute systemic toxicity, genotoxicity, chemical characterization of extractables/leachables, and inhalation risks from VOCs and particulates.

Substantial equivalence argument

The subject devices share identical intended use (airway management), same product code (BTR), same regulation (21 CFR 868.5730), identical construction materials (PVC cuff and shaft), and identical sterilization method with predicate devices. The removal of DEHP is a material improvement rather than a safety concern. Bench testing confirms equivalent performance in all critical characteristics (bonding strength, kink resistance, cuff function, tracheal seal). The narrower or equivalent size ranges and biocompatibility data demonstrate no new safety risks relative to predicates.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →