K-numberK241443
Device nameSutil Luxe Personal Lubricant (models 1126, 0009, 0010, 0011); Sutil Luxe Vanilla Personal Lubricant (models 1119, 1120); Sutil Luxe Coconut Personal Lubricant (models 1121, 1122); Sutil Luxe Mint Personal Lubricant (models 1117, 1118)
ApplicantHathor Professional Skincare , Ltd.
Product codeNUC
Device classClass II
Decision dateJan 21, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation884.5300
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

Sutil Luxe Personal Lubricant is a water-based, over-the-counter personal lubricant available in four formulations (unscented, vanilla, coconut, and mint) for penile and/or vaginal application. It is intended to moisturize, lubricate, and enhance comfort during intimate sexual activity while supplementing natural lubrication. The product is compatible with natural rubber latex and polyisoprene condoms but not polyurethane condoms.

Technological characteristics

The subject devices differ from the predicate (Desnuda Reflect) in formulation ingredients, viscosity specifications, osmolality ranges, and shelf life (2 years vs. 1 year). Both are water-based, non-sterile personal lubricants with identical condom compatibility profiles and undergo the same types of biocompatibility and microbiology testing, but the subject uses different thickening agents and includes botanical extracts (oat beta glucan, lotus root water) and stevia-based sweetener.

Test standards cited

ISO 10993-5:2009 (cytotoxicity), ISO 10993-10:2021 and ISO 10993-23:2021 (skin irritation and sensitization via HRIPT), ISO 10993-11:2017 (acute systemic toxicity), ASTM D7661-18 (condom compatibility), USP <51> (antimicrobial effectiveness), USP <61> (microbial limits), USP <62> (pathogenic organism absence), and USP general chapters for pH, viscosity, and osmolality.

Substantial equivalence argument

Both devices share identical indications for use, are water-based OTC personal lubricants with the same condom compatibility profile, and meet the same biocompatibility and microbiology testing requirements. Although formulation ingredients and shelf life differ, the submitter argues these differences do not raise different safety or effectiveness questions because all performance specifications meet established standards and biocompatibility testing confirms non-cytotoxicity, non-irritation, non-sensitization, and lack of systemic toxicity across all variants.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →