K-numberK241220
Device nameTina-quant Lipoprotein(a) Gen.2 Molarity
ApplicantRoche Diagnostics Operations
Product codeDFC
Device classClass II
Decision dateJan 24, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation866.5600
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Tina-quant Lipoprotein(a) Gen.2 Molarity is an in vitro immunoassay that quantitatively measures lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in human serum and plasma using cobas c systems. It reports results in nmol/L with calibration traceable to WHO/IFCC SRM2B reference material and is used to evaluate lipid metabolism disorders and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in conjunction with clinical evaluation and other lipoprotein tests.

Technological characteristics

The candidate device uses the same particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay method, cobas c instrument platform, sample types, calibrator, and control as the predicate. The key difference is traceability: the candidate is standardized to WHO/IFCC SRM2B reference material for nmol/L reporting, whereas the predicate used in-house reference material and reported in mg/dL. The candidate's measuring range is 7–240 nmol/L versus the predicate's 6.0–80 mg/dL.

Test standards cited

CLSI EP05-A3 (precision/repeatability and intermediate precision), CLSI EP17-A2 (limit of blank, detection, and quantitation), CLSI EP06-A-Ed2 (linearity assessment).

Substantial equivalence argument

The device is substantially equivalent because it uses the identical assay methodology, instrument platform, sample matrices, calibrator, and control materials as the predicate. Although the candidate reports results in a different unit system (nmol/L versus mg/dL) with standardization to an internationally recognized reference material rather than in-house material, analytical performance data demonstrate equivalent or superior accuracy (Deming regression r = 0.992), precision (CV ≤2.6%), and sensitivity. Method comparison to an Lp(a) ELISA reference standard (n=126) shows excellent correlation, and all performance acceptance criteria were met. The change to WHO/IFCC standardization represents a technological improvement—enabling harmonization with international standards—without altering the fundamental device function or clinical utility.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →