K-numberK241142
Device namemAXIS Stapes Prosthesis, mLOOP Stapes Prosthesis, mZAM Stapes Prosthesis and mFIX Stapes Prosthesis
ApplicantMED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH
Product codeETB
Device classClass II
Decision dateJan 17, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation874.3450
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The MED-EL PMEI Stapesplasty Prostheses (mAXIS, mLOOP, mZAM, mFIX) are partial ossicular replacement prostheses designed to restore sound transmission to the oval window by replacing the stapes arch and/or stapes arch and incus. They are implanted in the middle ear during stapedectomy or stapedotomy procedures to treat congenital or acquired stapes defects, otosclerosis, and inadequate conductive hearing from prior stapes surgery. The devices are single-use, sterile, and implanted by qualified ENT surgeons.

Technological characteristics

All four MED-EL devices are made of medical-grade titanium and differ primarily in coupling structure design: mAXIS uses a broad perforated spiral-shaped loop (0.5 mm width) with crimping; mLOOP and mZAM use narrower spiral-shaped loops (0.3 mm and 0.20 mm respectively) with crimping; mFIX uses a clip-type coupling (0.2 mm) with clipping attachment. All share identical piston diameters (0.4–0.6 mm), comparable functional lengths (3.5–10.0 mm range), MRI conditional labeling (1.5–7.0 T), and EN ISO 10993 biocompatibility.

Test standards cited

MRI environment (ASTM F2119, F2052, F2182); biocompatibility (EN ISO 10993); shelf-life (EN ISO 11607); sterilization validation (EN ISO 11137-1, EN ISO 11137-2); packaging validation (EN ISO 11607); and mechanical testing. Clinical data from a large multicenter retrospective post-market clinical follow-up study with 168–188 patients.

Substantial equivalence argument

MED-EL devices are substantially equivalent because they have identical materials, biocompatibility, attachment methods, packaging, and MRI characteristics to their predicate devices (Heinz Kurz prostheses). Although loop widths and designs vary slightly among MED-EL models, these variations fall within the range of existing predicate device designs and do not create different safety or effectiveness questions. Clinical outcomes (91.7% achieving postoperative air-bone gap ≤20 dB; 66.1% ≤10 dB) match state-of-the-art performance. The only difference—lack of an optional KURZ-Meter measuring tool—does not affect safety or effectiveness because alternative surgical tools are commercially available.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →