K-numberK240975
Device nameElectrosurgical Generator (ES-100); Electrosurgical Generator (ES-300)
ApplicantBeijing Taktvoll Technology Co., Ltd.
Product codeGEI
Device classClass II
Decision dateDec 23, 2024
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The ES-100 and ES-300 Electrosurgical Generators are high-frequency surgical devices that deliver RF energy via surgical instruments to cut and coagulate tissue. The ES-100 provides up to 100 W output power with 6 operating modes, while the ES-300 provides up to 300 W with 10 operating modes, both supporting monopolar and bipolar functionality.

Technological characteristics

Both devices operate at 416 kHz output frequency with similar waveforms, voltage output up to 4800 V, crest factor of 6.3, and modulation up to 25 kHz. Key differences include the ES-300's higher 300 W power output versus ES-100's 100 W, different input power specifications, and additional modes in the ES-300 (soft coagulation, three bipolar modes vs. one). The modulation frequency differs from the predicate's 30 kHz specification.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012+A2:2020 (medical electrical equipment general requirements), IEC 60601-1-2:2014 (electromagnetic disturbances), and IEC 60601-2-2:2017 (high frequency surgical equipment). Bench testing evaluated output performance across multiple modes; pre-clinical testing assessed thermal damage and edge carbonization across different tissues.

Substantial equivalence argument

The devices share identical indications for use with the predicate (Bovie IDS-310) and employ the same RF technology for cutting and coagulation. Bench testing demonstrated consistent output power trends across modes compared to the predicate. Pre-clinical thermal damage testing confirmed comparable performance in terms of injury dimensions and carbonization. Although some specifications differ (modulation frequency, input power), these differences do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions because output performance and thermal characteristics remain comparable to the legally marketed predicate device.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →