K-numberK240795
Device nameWithings ECG App
ApplicantWithings
Product codeQDA
Device classClass II
Decision dateJun 15, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation870.2345
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Withings ECG App is a software-only mobile application for over-the-counter use that works with the Withings ScanWatch smartwatch to create, record, store, and display a single-channel electrocardiogram similar to Lead I. It classifies heart rhythms to detect atrial fibrillation, sinus rhythm, and high heart rate (100-150 bpm), providing informational results intended to supplement but not replace clinical diagnosis.

Technological characteristics

Both the subject device and predicate (Apple ECG 2.0 App) are software-only devices with AFib detection algorithms that acquire sensor data from a smartwatch, process it through algorithms, and display rhythm classification to users. The main difference is electrode placement: Withings uses back-of-watch and bezel electrodes (requiring two-finger contact), while Apple uses back-of-watch and digital crown electrodes (requiring single-finger contact). Both operate on identical 30-second recording sessions and use single-channel Lead I equivalent ECG measurements.

Test standards cited

IEC 60601-2-47:2012 (ambulatory ECG systems), IEC 62368-1:2014 (thermal and electrical safety), ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1:2005 (medical electrical equipment basic safety), IEC 60601-1-2:2014 (electromagnetic compatibility), IEC 60601-1-11 (home healthcare environment), IEC 62304:2006/Amd 1:2015 (medical device software), AAMI/ANSI/IEC 62366-1:2015 (usability engineering), ISO 14971 (risk management), FCC Part 15 (radiofrequency), and AAMI TIR69:2017 and ANSI IEEE C63.27-2017 (wireless coexistence).

Substantial equivalence argument

Both devices share identical intended use (OTC electrocardiograph software for AFib and rhythm detection), same regulatory classification (Class II, Product Code QDA), same principle of operation (smartwatch sensor data acquisition followed by algorithm processing and rhythm classification), and same mechanism of action (electrical potential measurement between watch electrodes to generate ECG waveform). The minor difference in electrode location and finger contact method was validated through human factors testing and clinical studies demonstrating equivalent performance: 99.7% sensitivity for AFib and 99.8% specificity for sinus rhythm in the subject device versus equivalent predicate performance.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →