K-numberK233770
Device namePepper EMS Training System
ApplicantPepper Interactive, Inc.
Product codeNGX
Device classClass II
Decision dateJan 16, 2025
DecisionSubstantially Equivalent
Regulation890.5850
AI Summary extracted from FDA summary PDF · never regenerated
Intended use

The Pepper EMS Training System is a battery-powered muscle stimulator that uses electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) technology to stimulate healthy muscles and improve muscle performance in adults. It is an over-the-counter device intended for muscle conditioning and training, not for treating medical diseases or conditions. The system consists of a wearable suit with embedded electrodes and a battery box that communicates wirelessly with a smartphone app.

Technological characteristics

The device has 16 output channels (vs. 13 in the predicate), a smaller and lighter battery box (102×22mm, 152g vs. 148×78mm plus connectors, 248g), lower maximum output voltage and current, and a more restricted maximum program duration of 25 minutes vs. 60 minutes. It offers only three training programs (Cardio, Strength, Relax) which are a subset of the predicate's programs. All electrical parameters, waveforms, and safety features are equivalent or more conservative than the predicate device.

Test standards cited

AAMI/ANSI ES60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-2-10, IEC 62133 (battery safety), ISO 14971 (risk management), ISO 10993-5 and ISO 10993-10 (biocompatibility), and IEC 60601-1-6 (usability). Engineering bench testing followed FDA's 1999 Guidance Document for Powered Muscle Stimulator 510(k)s. Software was validated per FDA's General Principles of Software Validation.

Substantial equivalence argument

The Pepper EMS Training System is substantially equivalent because it shares identical indications for use, target population, output mode, waveform shape, and key electrical characteristics (net charge, burst duration, duty cycle) with the predicate Katalyst Training System. All design differences—such as the one-piece suit design, fewer/more conservative electrical parameters, additional channels, and smaller form factor—either do not affect the fundamental intended function or improve safety margins without introducing new risks. Both devices comply with the same core standards (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-10, IEC 62133), and all differences are within acceptable design variations for this device class.

Extracted by AI from the official FDA summary PDF →
Source

View the full FDA submission: accessdata.fda.gov

Researching this as a predicate?
Want a transparent AI-ranking score, AI-discovered related predicates, ongoing safety and warning-letter monitoring, full predicate chain lineage, and a drafted SE rationale — all saved to your own project? That's what an account adds.
Start free trial →

Everything you need for a 510(k) submission. Nothing you don't.

14-day free trial. No setup. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial →
Building an AI or ML-enabled device? Predicate search, PCCP tracking, and AI-specific FDA intelligence — built exclusively for AI/ML devices. Try AIFDA Intel →